Monthly Archives: May 2012

World No Tobacco Day 2012: Tobacco and Migrants

Despite the progress achieved as a result of WHO’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and actions taken by many national governments, the consumption of tobacco products remains high and indeed may be increasing in some parts of the world and among certain social and demographic groups.  Today tobacco is estimated to be still killing more than six million people a year, including the more than 600,000 non-smokers who are regularly exposed to second-hand smoke.  For every one who dies, moreover, another 20 smokers suffer from life-threatening diseases.  In the EU alone, more than 650,000 people die every year from smoking-related causes such as cancer, heart disease, stroke, emphysema, bronchitis, and chronic airway obstruction.  Half of these deaths occur in the 35-69 year old age group which means a massive blow to the social and economic development of the countries they live and would otherwise have worked in.

Not all people are at equal risk of smoking or of smoking-related diseases, however.  While middle-income and well-educated people in North America and Europe are smoking far less than they did in 2000, and far less than lower-income less well educated people, women and adolescents are smoking more now than they used to do.  Globally, major differences are also emerging between countries.  In the USA, for example, strong anti-smoking policies and better public information have helped to dramatically reduce the number of people who smoke and major health benefits have already been achieved as a result of this.  In other parts of the world, especially developing countries, however, improved economic conditions and higher wages have led to a more buying power among people who used to be poor, and rates of tobacco smoking in these groups have grown.  For much the same reason, migrants have also emerged as a high risk population.

Migrants tend to move from poor backgrounds and move to settings where their incomes are higher than they were at home.  They also tend to live in ethnic minority communities where smoking is still popular.  In the USA and other countries where rates of tobacco smoking in the general population have fallen in recent years, rates of smoking among migrants have remained very high, especially among women.  One of the main reasons for this is that migrants tend to be overlooked by national health promotion and protection programs and smoking prevention campaigns often fail to reach them with meaningful information.  Migrants have rarely been seen as a priority by national health and/or social protection departments and in most countries little is known about the psychosocial factors that drive them to smoke.  This is especially so in the case of rural-urban migrants and irregular migrants who remain relatively invisible to national health authorities.

If global smoking rates are to be brought down and global health improved, much more attention will have to be given to this massive and still-growing population of people that is moving from one place to another in search of a better life, but which often sees its health deteriorate significantly as a result of smoking as well as other challenges.  The continued neglect of migrants by national anti-smoking campaigns will thus not only harm migrants, but will eventually adversely affect the public health of host countries and increase the health care cost burden on them.  Preventing smoking in migrant populations would be a win-win for everyone.

Manuel Carballo

Immigration in the US : the views of Dr. Manuel Carballo and the findings of ICMHD studies

Dr. Manuel Carballo has been recently interviewed by United Press International in regards to immigration in the US.

You can read the news article on the UPI website: http://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2012/05/29/Studies-70-pct-of-immigrants-want-to-cry/UPI-42731338276600/

Certificate Course in International Public Health (CIPH)

Empower School of Health, in conjunction with “The International Centre for Migration Health and Development (ICMHD)”, “University of Ghana Medical School” and “University College of London (UCL),” is offering Certificate course in International Public Health in New Delhi, INDIA, July 1 – July 21, 2012.


Course objective To introduce and build the fundamentals of epidemiology, health systems, healthcare delivery (including mHealth/e-health solutions), healthcare financing (including Global Fund programs, health insurance) pharmaceutical sector and clinical research.  The course is designed to be hands-on and application-focused; learning principles of health/medical/pharma in India and applying this knowledge in participants’ own setting.


Approach Classroom teaching; case studies; field visits (visits to Ministry of Health, UN agencies, Global Fund funded projects, formal private sector, informal private sector (quacks), tertiary and primary health care centers, pharmaceutical factory, diagnostic centers, clinical research organization)


Student target profile : Health-medical students and   professionals currently working in health or allied fields; Government, UN and NGO staff.  Current enrollments include students from Europe, Africa, Middle-East, Central Asia, and South-Asia.


Faculty International/Indian; public sector/private sector; managers; scientists; researchers and policy specialists (Faculty have been trained at Harvard, Kellogg, MIT, IIMs, IITs, and have advised WHO, Global Fund, Gates Foundation, NORAD, DFID, MoH, UNAIDS, UNICEF, private pharma, CROs, and more).


Where Empower School Health, New Delhi, India


When July 2 to July 21 st  2012


Cost Tuition fee: USD 2,500; Field trip: USD 250; Accommodation: USD 1,000-1,500 = $3750 for 3 weeks


Scholarship:  2 people will be identified to spend between 3-10 months in India to work on an innovative project.  Tuition and housing costs will be funded by Empower School of Health.


Academic Partners :


Empower School of Health  works in 30 countries across Latin America, Africa, Asia and Europe strengthening institutional capacity of global health programs and conducts degree programs in clinical research management, pharmacovigilance and health & hospital management. Its academic partners include University College London, the Uppsala Monitoring Center (Sweden) and the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute.


The International Centre for Migration, Health and Development (ICMHD)   WHO Collaborating Centre:  A Geneva-based non-profit institution with offices in Africa, Asia and Europe. ICMHD is a WHO Collaborating Centre and works on all aspects of migration and health with academia, national governments and UN partners.


University of Ghana Medical School, WHO Collaborating Centre for Advocacy and Training in Pharmacovigilance:   In October 2010, the WHO designated the University of Ghana Medical School as a WHO Collaborating Centre for Advocacy and Training in Pharmacovigilance with a focus on providing technical support to national pharmacovigilance centers in Africa.


Instructions for filling the interactive form attached:


1. For Internet email users: Fill the form and click on submit button. A pop window will appear, choose “internet email”. Fill in your email address and name and click on send. This will lead to window asking for the location to save the file on your computer. Save it and send using your internet email to : international.course@empower.net.in


For more information kindly visit our website   http://www.empower.net.in


Download Brochure:   http://empower.net.in/webimages/Certificate%20Courses%20for%20web.pdf


Empower School of Health has received funding to support 25% of students’ tuition fee for people from Low income and Middle Low Income countries (LIC and LMIC) as defined by the World Bank. Registration must be completed by Jun 3, 2012.

A New Opportunity for Europe

President-elect François Hollande’s campaign was marked by an absence of the rhetoric on immigration that has come to characterize much of the political narrative of France and Greece in recent months.  This may well have contributed to his success in a country in which over 10 percent of the population is foreign-born and in which a far larger proportion is descended from recent immigrants.  No one should assume, however, that the issue of immigration in France, or indeed elsewhere in Europe, has gone away.  Migration into the EU remains a challenge that will not go away.

Migration is ultimately a function of supply and demand and the financial crisis confronting Europe has already contributed to both a slight decrease in the number of people arriving in the EU and to the departure of others who were already here but decided to go back to their countries of origin.  The EU will nevertheless continue to be seen as a region of hope and opportunity by the hundreds of thousands of people living in situations of worsening poverty and political instability.  As such it will continue to receive many more would-be immigrants in the coming years.

The challenge President Hollande and other European leaders will hopefully take up sooner than later, is the need to develop a comprehensive and cohesive inter-country approach to migration that takes into account the size and pace of immigration states require, and also the ways in which newcomers can be socially and culturally integrated.  In developing its policies and plans for migration, Europe will have to address the fact that dramatically falling birthrates in most EU countries are urgently calling for new immigrants who can rectify the demographic imbalance that is emerging between the young and the elderly.  The policies and plans that will hopefully emerge will also have to take into account the types of skills that are increasingly called for in countries where aging populations require a type of domiciliary care that is labor intensive and which has proved difficult to satisfy without labor input from outside.  Hopefully, any evidence based approach will equally recognize the fact that defining migrants as “illegal” or “irregular” does little more than prevent them from participating fully in national taxation systems.  Conversely, regularizing migrants quickly increases the number of tax-paying citizens who because they are largely young and healthy, do not make huge demands on national health systems.

Encouraging and facilitating the social and cultural integration of migrants remains another part of the equation that must be taken up with a sense of urgency.  At no time in history has it been so clear that migrants who are not encouraged or allowed to socially and culturally integrate risk remaining outside mainstream society and never really identifying with their host countries and their values.  The answer to this challenge will not be simple, but avoiding residential ghettos and ethnically biased schools will contribute much to achieving the goal of integration and ultimately benefit all stakeholders.

Reducing the need to leave countries of origin is of course the solution to massive migration, and here the EU has a unique opening to engage in a new type of focused international development aid that targets the countries and regions where poverty, conflict and persecution are forcing people to uproot and emigrate.  Europe needs to come to terms with the fact that international aid focused around this theme can be as economically productive to donor countries as it is to beneficiary ones.  If well designed it can not only bring employment and a better quality of life to oppressed people, but also open up new trade opportunities and better political relationships between countries.  Sending unwanted migrants back home with financial incentives and a promise of training, which is what some countries are now considering, will always be more expensive than providing them with training and economic enterprise possibilities before they are forced to leave.  Hopefully, these are some of the issues President Hollande will take up, and if he does, that other European leaders will follow him on.

Manuel Carballo